Show responses

Anonymous entries (9)

Response numberSort by Response number Ascending
(1) How would you rate the ...Sort by (1) How would you rate the ... Ascending
(2) How would you rate the ...Sort by (2) How would you rate the ... Ascending
(3) Was the instructor's ...Sort by (3) Was the instructor's ... Ascending
(4) How would you rate the ...Sort by (4) How would you rate the ... Ascending
(5) How would you rate the ...Sort by (5) How would you rate the ... Ascending
(6) How was the quality of ...Sort by (6) How was the quality of ... Ascending
(7) What aspects of the course ...Sort by (7) What aspects of the course ... Ascending
(8) What aspects of the course ...Sort by (8) What aspects of the course ... Ascending
Response number: 1Very goodGoodGoodGoodGoodGoodI enjoyed many aspects of the course. For example, the readings as well as how in depth the instructor went at the beginning to define and differentiate conflict resolution & their practitioners, human rights & their practitioners, & dispute resolution. I knew about all areas, but because I don't work directly in the field, so I was pretty ignorant about how different & distinct each one was. It was very interesting to learn. I enjoyed the webinars when I could make them as it was a chance at being interactive with other classmates.If there were some sort of way to practice or mock cases of the subjects we're learning about. For example, what it might look like to actually act as a mediator between two parties. This may only apply to me as I don't really work in this arena and I think a lot of my classmates might. But I thought it might be a cool angle to get to see what it might be like to practice what we're learning about. I also think that the nature of a 6 week course may make it difficult to go into greater depth. Thank you!
Response number: 2Very goodGoodVery goodGoodGoodVery goodHandoutsVideo quality
Response number: 3Very goodVery goodGoodVery goodGoodGoodThe Webinars and assignments team works.Less time for ODR and talk a bit about the risks for ADR\DR practitioners.
Response number: 4Very goodVery goodVery goodVery goodVery goodGoodThe readings and the inputs from the instructor and participantsthere was some technical difficulties with the webnars
Response number: 5Very goodGoodGoodVery goodAverageAverageI like the group assigment, because at teh moment we could find an especiffic time to connect and discusse and then answer the quetions. I would do more of thesem may all of the assigments, is easier to discuss two by two, and to read other people oppinios, than reading one by one and trying to connect to discuss. I liked the readding a lot. They were really usefull.The time is too short to read and answer in a week, and the webinar alive schedule wasn´t compatible with me, mostly because as one works is not that easy to connect at the times it says, at work I didn´t have the program to connect, and I couldn´t either skip work and go to the house to connect.
Response number: 6Very goodVery goodVery goodVery goodVery goodVery goodThe aspects of the course i like most include the methodology, the content and the delivery by the instructor.I do not really know what needs to change, for I am pleased with most aspects of the course. I could only say bravo!
Response number: 7Very goodGoodGoodVery goodGoodVery goodI thought the readings were very goodThe webinare need to be scheduled when many of the students can attend. That might mean scheduling it between midnight and 6 am EST
Response number: 8Very goodVery goodVery goodVery goodVery goodVery goodParticipation of the studentsNothing
Response number: 9Very goodGoodGoodGoodGoodAveragethe interactive nature of the instructorfind a better way for audio to flow through. head piece.